Iran firmly rejected the peace plan proposed by the United States, calling it "excessive." This statement was conveyed through Iranian state media, emphasizing that the final decision regarding the war rests solely with Tehran.

This rejection reflects the deepening tensions between the two countries. Iran believes the American proposal does not reflect a balance of interests but rather seeks strategic pressure on its national sovereignty.

In response, Iran not only rejected it but also put forward five key conditions that must be met if the war is to end. This move demonstrates Tehran's attempt to shift its position from being the party offering a solution to being the one determining the direction of negotiations.

Among the conditions put forward, Iran demands a complete cessation of military attacks and a guarantee that conflict will not recur in the future. Furthermore, compensation for war losses is also a key demand, considered crucial by the Iranian government.

Furthermore, Iran also emphasized the importance of recognizing its strategic sovereignty, including control of the Strait of Hormuz, a vital route for global energy trade. This demand has major implications for international economic stability.

On the other hand, the United States proposal itself reportedly includes several key points. These include an end to Iran's nuclear program, restrictions on regional military activity, and the reopening of international shipping lanes.

However, Iran considers these demands unrealistic and often unilateral. One senior official even asserted that the war will only end under conditions determined by Iran itself.

This situation demonstrates a deepening diplomatic impasse, where the two sides differ not only in interests but also in approaches to resolving the conflict.

Amid this impasse, global concerns continue to mount. A prolonged conflict has the potential to escalate regional tensions and disrupt the stability of global energy markets, on which the region is heavily dependent.

Mediation efforts by various international parties are ongoing. However, without a real compromise from either side, the chances of a ceasefire anytime soon appear slim.

Ultimately, Iran's rejection of the United States' proposal is not merely a diplomatic response but also a signal that the conflict has entered a more complex phase, where bargaining power is a key factor in determining the future direction of the region.

Primary Source by BBC, Secondary Sources by Axios, The Times, and The Guardian.